ANWAR IBRAHIM AND HIS TALES OF PRECIOUS DNA THAT KEEP ON CHANGING BOTH THEIR COLORS

DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) SHOULD AND COULD NOT be the issue in this latest twist involving THE POLICE and DATO SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM.

It is not a matter of fabricating the evidence, which then can easily BE CHALLENGED in court and be asked for RE-EXAMINATION AND RE-TESTING at a neutral lab under the supervision of neutral experts. It is not a matter of planting an evidence either, as the whole process from the taking of a sample up to the production of a DNA PROFILE, which took as little as 5 hours (depending), can be monitored and even executed by neutral parties or experts. What more when Anwar Ibrahim can even have his own representatives to guard or monitor the whole profiling thing to be sure that none of the given samples be taken away for other use. So what is the excuse NOT TO then?

The issue is more than what meets the eye.

This is what reported of Anwar Ibrahim saying in a press conference on July 1, 2008:

He called on the police not to spring a surprise arrest, adding his lawyers had written three letters to the Inspector General of Police and the Attorney-General indicating his willingness to co-operate in the investigation.

“They did not reply until today. TAKE MY DNA, TAKE MY HAIR ... my hair is everywhere, except this part,” said Anwar as he smiled and patted the middle part of his scalp.

And this is what Anwar Ibrahim said next after he was released prior to him not giving his DNA for investigations.

“I have my reasons, based on the advice of my lawyers and local and foreign DNA experts. My DNA sample is already with the police. Secondly, the accuser is in police custody. Anything can happen. Why the need for DNA from me?

This is then asked of his lawyer R. Sivarasa regarding foreign and neutral DNA expert’s assistance to help Anwar Ibrahim establishing the truth in which R. Sivarasa was reported saying:

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim WILL NOT AGREE to the idea of a FOREIGN FORENSIC EXPERT OF HIS CHOICE to draw a DNA sample from him, said lawyer R. Sivarasa.

“They (the police) fail to understand Anwar’s concern as explained this afternoon. It does not address the possible fabrication of DNA (test results) starting with Saiful (Bukhari Azlan) himself,”

To a question whether Anwar and his lawyers would consider allowing the international expert to carry out the DNA test, he said they could “start to look at that” as the expert might be able to advise them.

However, he said this would not make a difference if there was a possibility that the samples would be tampered with.

He said they would RESIST ANY LEGAL ACTION for Anwar to provide a DNA sample because the law does not provide for it.

Then came the last straw set by Anwar Ibrahim in order for him to give his sample for DNA testing. As reported:

At his press conference earlier, Anwar had said that if there was “compelling evidence one, two, three and four which needs an international expert,” then he would be willing to submit to DNA testing.

Meaning, UNLESS the police has one, two, three, four or more evidence, which then shall be attended and verified only by international foreign experts, he won’t be submitting any samples for DNA testing even for the CAUSE TO ESTABLISH HIS INNOCENCE.

Anwar Ibrahim said YES then NO then YES then NO then YES with conditions but then a NO UNLESS. So how can we expect to believe Anwar Ibrahim anymore??

He does not trust the police, the lab and the system. He trusts only advice given by foreign experts. The authority then suggested him to have his experts to monitor the sampling process. He bombarded the idea suggesting it as not enough a courtesy. The authority then suggested him to have his choice of foreign DNA experts to co-work with the whole DNA profiling process. He mocked the idea saying it isn’t good enough as evidence can still be fabricated. So what on earth is the way befits him that he wants? Why and what with all those excuses and reasons and escapes?? Why is he not eagerly wanting and seeking the truth and get this whole sodomy thing done once and for all? It only takes 5 hours to get a DNA profile done? What so frustrating about that? 5 hours under the eyes, microscope and hands of his own trusted and chosen DNA technicians and experts who will make sure that none of the given samples be taken away for other use. So what the issue does fabrication of evidence is and now has then? None at all! So why keep on giving excuses after excuses? Shocking, surprising, confusing yet so amusing.

DNA IS NOT THE PROBLEM so too the police and the foreign experts. THE PROBLEM IS ANWAR IBRAHIM.

As ODD AND TWISTED as the DNA may looks like, ANWAR IBRAHIM RINGING EXCUSES ARE FAR TOO TWISTED to believe that such molecules still very much alive and exist in a man’s body.

ANWAR IBRAHIM MAY ACT LIKE A HERO BUT THE QUESTIONS OF WHY PROVE HIM BEING THE VILLAIN

The QUESTION is not WHY ANWAR wasn’t given the benefit of the agreed Wednesday 2 pm extended schedule before he was apprehended, but rather, WHY ANWAR DEFIED an earlier police order requesting him to be present on MONDAY? Why Anwar not doing so the DAY AFTER? And why Anwar CHOSE TO give priority and attended to Anti Coruption Agency’s hearing instead of adhering and obeying to the urgency of an ARREST WARRANT on behalf of the police on him to facilitate the sodomy case involving him? WHY ANWAR?

He snubbed and mocked the authority of the police by staying at home instead of attending to police request for him to make himself available on Monday. He then cited police discourtesy as the main reason for HIS PAYBACK in not adhering to the Monday request. WHY ANWAR?

So much for his proclaimed ‘WILLINGNESS’ and yet he made NO such effort at all to either contact the police or to attend to the police on TUESDAY. WHY ANWAR? 24 ABSOLUTE FREE HOURS for him to make things easier for both him and the police, if ONLY he chooses to stay true to his word and intention of ‘willingness’. Instead he did nothing. He knew the police could not come banging his door down without a proper court order which is the arrest warrant. Hence, to say Anwar Ibrahim and his team of 7 legal experts know nothing about this and what’s coming is an absolute lie and ignorance. WHY ANWAR?

On WEDNESDAY, police made known to Anwar Ibrahim, his representatives and all Malaysians, that an arrest warrant has been issued out on Anwar and the police will use the power and regulations given to, if the need arises, apprehends Anwar Ibrahim. And to have an arrest warrant issued out against you is no child’s play and kidding. The seriousness in one would have had any sensible Malaysian losing sleep and eating appetites worrying about one. But NOT our dearest Anwar Ibrahim. He chose the ‘on need and free basis’ appointment with the ACA instead of obeying the arrest warrant. An ACA’s appointment which he could have easily postponed without anyone blaming him for. WHY ANWAR?

He made a promise earlier with the police to straight away go to Kuala Lumpur police headquarters after the ACA’s session. But yet again, he did not. He DIVERTED his route towards his house in Segambut Dalam. With yet another melodramatic reason, this time of lunch and dresses. WHY ANWAR?

Anwar Ibrahim has been requested, invited, served and entertained up to the nose. He has been given treatments that none other Malaysians would have throughout their entire lifetime dealing with the police. He has been defying not one but many rightly requests and laws and acted himself above even the Sultan and all Malaysians. WHY ANWAR? Yet we still do not want to see and believe what the real Anwar Ibrahim looks like.

“No one is above the law”. I and you and hundreds Non-Government Organizations (NGO) have made that one statement as our course of promoting, mission worth action and basis principle to civilization. And if the laws require you to adhere, obey and act to one and as long it is within its guiding perimeters, then we should all be a sensible civilized Malaysian and respect the wishes of Malaysians and the land Malaysia. And that includes SULTAN ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM!

ANWAR IBRAHIM NOT GIVING HIS DNA FOR FREE WITHOUT HAVING ANOTHER TWIST INTO THE MIDST

DATO’ SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM TURNED DOWN a police request for him to allow a DNA sample to be taken. (Read here)

It is so CLEAR NOW on what BRAND OF JUSTICE AND TRUTH Anwar Ibrahim was promoting when comes to this case of sodomy involving him. Sadly, it wasn’t the one we have much expected from a man who claimed to be fighting for justice and upholding the truth.

In this latest episode of Anwar not giving his cooperation and permission to the police for his DNA to be taken to FACILITATE THE INVESTIGATION in which he is, as the accused, so much involved in, is not just a show of one Malaysian man who defied the laws and extended courtesies given to him, but more so, an act of a man who tried to NOT exposing the truth about the case and to MANIPULATE publicity into a platform to further propagates his innocence by claiming politics as the motivation for his arrests and alleged sodomy charges. When a better and sensible tool in DNA TESTING would have fast given his claimed of innocence and so-called conspiracies much truth and credibility; HE CHOSE NOT TO. WHY?. But that defying stand will be put to rest for good when the police is expected to obtain a REMAND ORDER (tomorrow) from court of law which then entitle them to fully prosecute all standard and required investigation procedures on Anwar Ibrahim, including for his DNA to be taken. Hence, Anwar Ibrahim will be, at least tonight, spending his time under police custody.

MALAYSIANS WANT THE TRUTH especially in a case as highly immoral as sodomy and as highly controversial involving one very prominent politician as Anwar Ibrahim. And that can only be known through due diligent and accorded processes of investigations which in this Anwar case, will depend much on his DNA proof. The NO by Anwar could only add to the belief by many that he is either ESCAPING THE TRUTH OR PLANNING THE TRUTH. Whichever way, it does not look good for both Anwar Ibrahim’s personalities and coming strategies.

ANWAR IBRAHIM ARRESTED AFTER SO MUCH IN DIVERTED AND IN LIBERTY

DATO SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM HAS BEEN ARRESTED earlier today at the vicinity of his house in Segambut after returning from a scheduled trip to Anti Corruption Agency (ACA) in Putrajaya but not before HE DIVERTED from his commitment to straight away go to Kuala Lumpur Police Headquarters, as planned.

The arrest was made by Bukit Aman’s Serious Crime Division and not by the more aggressive and specially tasked Special Action Force or UTK although the personnel were seen clad in UTK’s common kit of ‘Balaclava’ dressing. The arrest was the follow-up to the ARREST WARRANT issued out on Anwar for his failure to attend to police investigation of a SODOMY report made by one, Saiful Bukhari Azlan on June 28 against him. Anwar had been informed in a notice given by the police, for a compulsory attendance scheduled last Monday which he then failed to turn up and, according to the police, without any prior excuse given. But Anwar’s lawyer Sankara Nair rebutted the claim saying he had faxed a written excuse on behalf of Anwar Ibrahim to both the police and Minister in the Home Ministry.

According to Deputy Home Minister Datuk Wan Farid Wan Salleh, Anwar Ibrahim was supposed to have gone straight to the police headquarters here in Kuala Lumpur, after his interview at the Anti Corruption Agency in Putrajaya. Instead, he added, Anwar was on his way home and that was a clear possibility that he (Anwar) couldn’t and wouldn’t have made it to the police headquarters. Hence, the police had no option other than to execute the arrest warrant and arrested him.

Many observers believed Anwar Ibrahim has NO real intentions of going to the Police even with the warrant issued against him. He purposely wanted the police to come and get him so that he can channel the situation into blackmailing Malaysians for sympathy. He wants to resurrect the memory of the year 1998 when he was arrested under the same offence into the mind of Malaysians. Although the arrest this time around came under different momentum and virtue, and Anwar Ibrahim has NOT YET BEEN FORMALLY CHARGED under sodomy; the re-enactment of him being arrested by the same forces and politics 10 years ago, would have many Malaysians fell into further malicious and sinister games of speculations. And this is the kind of diversion and capital needed by Anwar Ibrahim to spell off the public from the truth and to stand by him under the pretext of injustice and conspiracies done in order to prevent him from achieving his so-called destiny of becoming the next PRIME MINISTER of Malaysia.

While Anwar Ibrahim and his entourage of lawyers and political allies have been showering Malaysians with tapes and tales of conspiracies in regard to this latest claim of him sodomizing a former aide; other CONCERNING QUARTERS have been very vocal in voicing their dissatisfaction over the SPECIAL TREATMENTS given to Anwar Ibrahim by the police. While common Malaysians will definitely be apprehended by the police in a matter of minutes; Anwar Ibrahim, on the other hand, had been given days and was so much on his own sweet time, liberties and arrangements, with the police doing absolutely NOTHING. The police has accommodated and done many things for Anwar Ibrahim that and which other Malaysians can only dream off. And these sorts of things did not go down well with many Malaysians. Many of them are questioning the police as to why the special treatments and why the selective attitudes over Anwar Ibrahim? Is Anwar Ibrahim not a Malaysian like the rest of the 27 mil souls that inhabit the country?

Hence, the arrest was seen coming. The arrest itself has nothing to do with politics. It was the right and suppose thing to do by the police not just on Anwar Ibrahim but any Malaysians too, once an arrest warrant has been issued. There should not be any double standard in approach in this matter upon any Malaysian.

Many have been writing about injustice on Anwar Ibrahim FORGETTING the fact that the one who has been MUCH DERAILED from proper justice by the public and to some extents, the authority as well, is the victim in this sodomy case, SAIFUL AZLAN BUKHARI.

Politically motivated or not, the only fact that should be taken and judge upon is the one that involves the accused and the accuser in a ‘proved or otherwise’ game whereby the victim has to prove that the accused had done such thing. And that needs no Einstein to waste the brain with any conspiracy theory. It’s a plain and simple YES or NO case.

More update to come…

HAS TUAN GURU NIK AZIZ NIK MAT BEEN BRIEFED OF ANWAR'S CASE?

A RELIABLE SOURCE HAS INFORMED me that PAS Spiritual Leader and Kelantan MB, TUAN GURU NIK AZIZ NIK MAT was in Kuala Lumpur yesterday on the INVITATION by the investigation Authorities in Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim ALLEGED SODOMY CASE. WHY?

I shall, however, DISCLOSE NOTHING about the invitation of Tuan Guru Nik Aziz and what transpired until this piece of information is CONFIRMED AND VERIFIED. IF, it did happen.

UNTIL THEN, this particular statement remains as a HEARSAY. Although I have been told of the full version.

Anyone care to share any knowledge in regards to the above matter, can kindly do so by replying to this statement.

(This writing will be deleted soon).

SHAMELESS AND SELFISH WORSENING STATE OF STATUTORY DECLARATION MADE IN THE NAME OF JUSTICE

Malaysia’s standard of STATUTORY DECLARATION has nose-dived into its lowest and most shameful.

Just as I did an article touching on the matter pertaining to the current health of this particular legal instrument called STATUTORY DECLARATION yesterday; it has now becoming a real malaria kind of diseases and TURNING the whole legal aspect of integrity of the said instrument and its system or act in place, in Malaysia, into SHAMEFUL SHAMELESS JOKES.

The makers or subscribers to the Statutory Declaration, the so-called advising lawyers (legal practitioners) and the politicians cum enforcers, and too does the one who simply stamped and signed the Statutory Declaration for the sake of ensuring any HEARSAY made possible for a mere price of RM5.00 (ONLY!); are to be blamed for this NEW CIRCUS IN TOWN. They have no absolute shame in making mockery out of what supposed to be a sacred, trusted and respected legal tendering document. They recklessly used every loopholes found in one particular instrument, to the best joy and thrill they could ever had. These irresponsible few POLITICAL ACTORS and FACILITATORS, have had no respect for millions suffering Malaysians whom they dragged into by holding the very essence of MALAYSIA LAW AND ORDER and more importantly TRUST, in the circus act of hanging those, upside down. These HERRINGS and PREDATORS portrayed themselves as ANGELS and CRUSADERS to cloud our fragile judgments and senses, into believing something which is actually nothing to begin with. At the end of the ‘not  so brightest’ day, they ‘the brightest of all’ would (most probably) got themselves well and handsomely paid with dollars and cents, while we keep on adding suffering into our already suffered livelihoods.

YESTERDAY, a person by the name Balsubramaniam a/l Perumal made a Statutory Declaration in the presence of the Crusaders Brigade which consisted of Malaysia Head of Opposition Force, DATO SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM, Anwar’s ‘knows about everything’ lawyer R. SIVARA, Balasubramaniam’s lawyer AMERICK SINGH SIDHU and a barrage of local and foreign journalist.

TODAY, less than 24 hours later, that same person (Balsubramaniam a/l Perumal) who made that solemnly declared Statutory Declaration yesterday, put every and each one Malaysian in NAKED AND DISBELIEF, WHEN HE, Balsubramaniam a/l Perumal, made a SUDDEN RETRACTS of part of his given Statutory Declaration under the pretext (or excuse) that he has BEEN FORCED and/or BEEN UNDER DURESS to come out with the earlier declared Statutory Declaration.

Has he been forced to come out with the earlier Statutory Declaration, mindless the contents which were much of a hearsay or been informed by things, rather than facts? On what ground did one has the capability to force him to do so? Didn’t he has any concern of what repercussion and consequence may be fallen onto him and million other Malaysians? Why the sudden retract then?

The on-going obsessive and abusive usages of Statutory Declaration as a tool to promote malicious intent (and maybe lies) and by ways of integrating HEARSAY as the core legalised part in such a Statutory Declaration is, has made Malaysia a laughing stock, not just among Malaysians but sadly too, to the visiting and concerning foreigners as well.

The accusers, subscribers, politicians and lawyers involved should stop and ponder upon the whole shenanigans for a while. What benefit does it bring to the already tainted legal and judiciary acumens and systems we had? And what pain-stopping remedy does it has to heal the current suffering of the 27mils Malaysians, which is getting worse by day? IF NONE, then we Malaysians simply have to just STOP buying all these cheap stunt and acting, ONCE AND FOR ALL. Or else, we shall all be gullible no less than we have been before.

And thanks to Balasubramaniam, he has proven it to be so SADLY but unbelievably TRUE.

BALASUBRAMANIAM THE PI RETRACTS HIS PROCLAIMED TRUTH AND KNOWLEDGE ON NAJIB

BALASUBRAMANIAM A/L PERUMAL dropped the second bombshell in less than 24 hours, after making his earlier Statutory Declaration, which was made then under the WATCHFUL EYES of his lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu, PKR leader Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Anwar’s lawyer R. Sivarasa; this time CLAIMING that HE WAS FORCED TO MAKE HIS SHOCKING STATUTORY DECLARATION linking Najib to Altantuya.
(Read NSTP) and (Read Malaysiakini)

Below is the NEW Statutory Declaration made by Balasubramaniam retracting his dire and absolute knowledge of Deputy Prime Minister NAJIB TUN RAZAK’s involvement via ABDUL RAZAK BAGINDA.

But this portion extracted would help to conclude what Balasubramaniam earlier Statutory Declaration is all about.“ 4. I wish to RETRACT all the statements that I have made in paragraphs 8, 25, 28, 49 and 50 to 52 of my statutory declaration dated July 1, 2008. The statements contained in paragraphs 8, 25, 28, 49 and 50 to 52 of my statutory declaration dated July 1, 2008 ARE INACURATE AND NOT THE TRUTH. I wish to expressly state that:….”

So he LIED then. What is NEXT?

…………………………………………

STATUTORY DECLARATION

1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having joined as a constable in 1981. I was subsequently promoted to the rank of lance corporal and finally resigned from the Royal Malaysian Police Force in 1998.

2. I currently work as a freelance private investigator.

3. I wish to refer to the statutory declaration I affirmed on July 1, 2008. I refer specifically to paragraphs 8, 25, 28, 49 and 50 to 52, wherein I have stated inter-alia that:

a) Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was introduced to Altantuya Shaariibuu by a VIP;

b) Najib Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Altantuya Shaariibuu and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse;

c) Najib Razak instructed Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Altantuya Shaariibuu as he did not want her to harass him since he was the deputy prime minister;

d) Najib Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Altantuya Shaariibuu had met and all been together at a dinner in Paris;

e) Altantuya Shaariibuu wanted money in the sum of US$500,000 as a commission for a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris;

f) Altantuya Shaariibuu met Najib Razak in Singapore;

g) Altantuya Shaariibuu wanted me to arrange to see Najib Razak;

h) I told the police about the relationship between Najib Razak and Altantuya Shaariibuu but when it came to sign my statement this detail was left out;

i) The prosecutor during the course of the trial in the High Court of Shah Alam did not ask me any questions in respect of Altantuya Shaariibuu’s purported relationship with Najib Razak or of a phone call I received from one DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC to Najib Razak and/or his wife;

j) Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he had sent Najib Razak an SMS the evening before he was arrested but did not receive a response; and

k) Najib Razak sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda on the day of his arrest to the effect that he was going to see the IGP that day and that the matter should be resolved and for Abdul Razak Baginda to remain calm.

4. I wish to retract all the statements that I have made in paragraphs 8, 25, 28, 49 and 50 to 52 of my statutory declaration dated July 1, 2008. The statements contained in paragraphs 8, 25, 28, 49 and 50 to 52 of my statutory declaration dated July 1, 2008 are inaccurate and not the truth. I wish to expressly state that:

a) At no material time did Abdul Razak Baginda inform me that he was introduced to Altantuya Shaariibuu by a VIP;

b) At no material time did Razak Baginda inform me that Najib Razak had a sexual relationship with Altantuya Shaariibuu and the she was susceptible to anal intercourse;

c) At no material time did Abdul Razak Baginda inform me that Najib Razak instructed Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Altantuya Shaariibuu as he did not want her to harass him since he was the deputy prime minister;

d) At no material time did Razak Baginda and/or Altantuya Shaariibuu inform me that Najib Razak, together with Abdul Razak Baginda and Altantuya Shaariibuu had met and all been together at a dinner in Paris;

e) At no material time did Altantuya Shaariibuu inform me that she wanted money in the sum of US$500,000 as a commission for a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris;

f) At no time whatsoever did Abdul Razak Baginda and/or Altantuya Shaariibuu inform me that Najib Razak met with Altantuya Shaariibuu in Singapore;

g) At no time whatsoever did Altantuya Shaariibuu inform me that she wanted me to arrange to see Najib Razak;

h) At no time did I tell the police during the course of their investigations about any relationship between Najib Razak and Altantuya Shaariibuu as no such relationship existed to my knowledge. Accordingly, the statement I signed before the police is complete;

i) At no time did Abdul Razak Baginda inform me that he had sent Najib Razak an SMS the evening before he was arrested; and

j) At no time did Abdul Razak Baginda inform me that Najib Razak had sent him an SMS on the day of his arrest to the effect that he was going to see the IGP that day and that the matter should be resolved and for Abdul Razak Baginda to remain calm.

5. In addition, I wish to retract the entire contents of my statutory declaration dated July 1, 2008. I was compelled to affirm the said statutory declaration dated July 1, 2008 under duress.

And I make this solemn declaration voluntarily and conscientiously believing the same to be true, and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1960.

Balasubramaniam a/l Perum

UNIT 1151 WHERE THE ALLEGED SODOMY TOOK PLACE BELONGS TO ANWAR'S FRIEND

The APARTMENT UNIT NUMBER 1151 of DESA DAMANSARA CONDOMINIUM, where the alleged sodomy as claimed by the victim, MOHD SAIFUL BUKHARI AZLAN, took place; DOES NOT belongs to Saiful or rented by him.

The said unit is in-fact, BELONGS TO A FRIEND OF DATO SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM, whom had given him the access (the keys and entering card, both presumably) to the apartment; according to one news report.

(Read the full report here)

ANWAR IBRAHIM WAS DISCREETLY SEEN ENTERING THE REPORTED CONDO, CLAIMED SECURITY GUARD

"Yes, I SAW HIM enter once or twice, but this was quite a while ago. He came in a vehicle not commonly available in Malaysia. It had tinted windows. I saw who was in the car when they wound down the window to touch the card at the guard house to gain entry into the premises."

(Read the full report here)

SAIFUL BUKHARI'S CASE HAS NOW BEEN OFFICIALLY CLASSIFIED AS SODOMY

The SEXUAL REPORT against DATO’ SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM has been classified as SODOMY.

This was the first time police have revealed that investigations had started after earlier saying that the allegations were mere heresay.

Yesterday, Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar put to rest speculation about the investigations.

"The case has been classified as sodomy," he told the New Straits Times, adding that he could not comment further as investigations were still going on.

Checks yesterday (by NSTP) also revealed that doctors at the Kuala Lumpur Hospital, after a battery of tests, found indications that MOHD SAIFUL HAD ENGAGED IN ANAL SEX.

(Read the full report here)

ANWAR IBRAHIM SHOULD STOP HIDING AND SELLING, TO START ROLLING THE TRUTH

DATO’ SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM should STOP THE HIDING behind the Turkish walls and face up to this reported accusation of him being the party involved in a sodomy case against one, MOHD SAIFUL BUKHARI AZLAN. IF NOT for the reason of BEING THE MAN OF HIS WORDS, then DO IT for the reason of facilitating the police to carry on their duties in investigating this case, thoroughly and fairly. Which means, Anwar has to make himself available NOW that he is needed. The problem now that Anwar since has exclusively made the TURKEY EMBASSY as his own; is the PROTOCOL that the police or Malaysian Authorities have to obtain from the Turks in order to get to Anwar. And this does not go well with many Malaysians.(Read here)

Malaysians are smart nowadays to simply buy the given pretext of “someone to assassinate me…my life is at stake…etc”. Malaysians have been cooked up too many times, too repeatedly and frequently by the charismatic, energetic and enigmatic READY-MADE REASONS often at used by desperate politicians in desperate attempts. And taking refuge in an Official Foreign House of Administration especially the one much affiliated to the US is like ABANDONING Malaysia, its law, its people and the once famously principle of his own (Anwar Ibrahim) in standing up fighting and dare to face to consequence.

Anwar Ibrahim in calling up for the Rakyat to stand up, be brave and face the evil and corrupted mind of one, the government (which he indirectly claimed as the one in among the many that are responsible in his latest phobia episode of fabrication), SHOULD REFLECT the calling upon HIMSELF (instead of burdening the Rakyat with his wicked intent), and PUT HIS LIFE IN TRUST of God (ALLAH SWT), in trust of the country Malaysia (the nation), in the people who care and love him, in his political party and the newly-formed Pakatan Rakyat coalition, in the reformed judiciary and police force and most important, IN TRUST THAT THE TRUTH SHALL PREVAIL AND SHALL SET YOU FREE.

There’s NOTHING…nothing to be afraid of if we are in the truth. And there’s NOTHING…nothing worth dying for other than doing if for the truth and of what we believe in and fighting for. IF NOT WILLING, THEN JUST BE HUMAN INSTEAD OF SUPER-HUMAN…JUST BE MALAYSIAN INSTEAD OF SUPER-MALAYSIAN. JUST BE ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM, INSTEAD OF DATO’ SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM THE CONQUEROR OF EVIL, THE SAINT OF JUSTICE, THE FATHER OF REFORMATION, THE TIME MAGAZINE 100 MOST INFLUENTIAL MAN etc…

Show us the WAY and show us the TRUTH, dear Dato’. We had enough of theories hovering around the nation. We even had an INNOCENT GIRL put to SHAME (and mentally tortured) through the irresponsible acts of some people in PUBLISHING HER PICTURE. Read the article here, and you Dato’, perhaps will understand more of what the heck of a situation is happening now…much because of you.

QUESTIONS FLYING OVER THE SO-CALLED 'ADHOC' RELATIONSHIP OF ANWAR AND SAIFUL

QUESTIONS are flying in at unperturbed speed QUESTIONING the relation between the accused DATO SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM and the accuser (and victim), 23 YEARS OLD MALE BY THE NAME MOHD SAIFUL BUKHARI B. AZLAN.

How come a YOUNG MALE AT THE AGE OF 23 can be and was appointed as a SPECIAL ASSISTANT to such a figure, Anwar Ibrahim, who supposedly and should be more in needs of someone who is much higher in experience and older as one, Special Assistant? A 23 years old hero, who had just graduated into Anwar’s circle 3 months ago, cant be that too exceptionally well to be bestowed with such trust and post as a Special Assistant succeeding many other potential and trustworthy candidates. So what’s the REASON AND RATIONAL for Saiful Bukhari inclusion and appointment then? Whats the CATCH this 23 years old has that no one others have?

Why did Anwar Ibrahim, for such a smart and cautious politician he is, chooses a young male with only 3 months of party experience, to be his Special Assistant? What is so special about this 23 years old male then? What did he see in this 23 years old that others don’t?

Anwar Ibrahim had since, DENIED the truth in the allegation and was contemplating on taking legal actions against the accuser. The accuser and victim, Saiful Bukhari meanwhile is reported to be somewhere in a hospital in Kuala Lumpur most probably for medical investigations. (Read here)

Various statements have also been made by higher members of the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) discrediting the accuser/victim and defending their leader Anwar Ibrahim. (Read here) (and here).

One observer who wants to remain anonymous pointed out saying “ Anwar Ibrahim is a very smart, cunning and daring personality. This is no surprising since he was a product and once a student leader of the famous Malay College of Kuala Kangsar (MCKK). An EXCLUSIVE ALL BOYS ONLY COLLEGE AND CLUB”. “3 MONTHS!. That is how long it takes for both of them Anwar and Saiful to know one another. 3 months to get to know one another for a political venture seems QUITE AN ODD ADHOC of a union to me and a funny amazingly easily of how a short span in period of time can have its magic for one to embrace the other”.
“Will it surprise you then… No need to be lah… But we all should wait and don’t easily be caught in all these politically motivated shenanigans. The truth will come out sooner or later. But I already have mine…” he said closing his arguments.

More to come…

ANWAR IBRAHIM IS ACCUSED OF SODOMY BY HIS SPECIAL ASSISTANT

Opposition Stalwart and Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) De Facto Leader, DATO’ SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM has been ACCUSED OF SODOMY in a police report made by the accuser named MOHD SAIFUL BUKHARI who is also a Special Assistant to Anwar Ibrahim. (Read here)

Within hours after the report, some quarters within PKR wasted no time in sending sms-es, revoking the merit of the police report by claiming that Saiful Bukhari was forced to do it BUT no elaborations given as to by who and for what.

KL’s CID Chief SAC Ku Chin Wah has meanwhile, confirmed a report had been made on Anwar Ibrahim but declined to comment further but added that NO ARREST shall take place until the matter is studied and investigated.

It is reported that a SUDDEN CRISIS MEETING is currently being held by the Party (PKR) top members to discuss the issue and the courses if Anwar Ibrahim is to be detained.

More to come…